When I workout I like to listen to hardcore gangster rap. Especially NWA, Immortal Technique and the rapper Paris. Hard Truth Soldiers.
Don’t Tase Me, Bro!
I just watched that popular youtube video of the University of Florida lecture with John Kerry and the student asking him a question. This is the video that sparked the trendy “Don’t Tase Me Bro” rehashes, song’s and merchandise and T-shirts with “Don’t Tase Me Bro!” across the front.
I heard the audio before, but I finally watched the actual video the first time. My blood is boiling. If there is one thing in this world that makes me angry and makes me feel like cracking some skulls, it’s unjust violence. These cops run over and grab this student for simply asking questions, then they start to drag him away and lay him down on the ground and start putting handcuffs on him. The student is arrested for asking legitimate questions. Then, the cops pull out a taser and tase him repeatedly, for asking questions to a politician. Resisting? Sure. If you weren’t doing anything illegal why should you be arrested? I can understand. Of course the student could have taken a different approach, just went along without struggling and then taken care of it with legal actions later. If you resist, that’s what they will charge you with. If you don’t and just go jellyfish, they can’t legitimately say you resisted and it makes the cops look worse. Sometimes I (more than I’d like to admit) feel like giving in to it all and just go along to get along because there is this ridiculous delusion that if I don’t make any waves, submit to the tyranny and just be a good slave to this criminal government then everything will be alright. Right. When we do this they win and we lose. Well, I’m not much of a competitive man, but when it comes to my freedom, you can bet I’m going to fight. Kerry did win the election, and he did not contest it at all, on the first day he just layed down, as if it was all planned out. Perhaps that’s why this student was asking him about his membership in the Skull and Bones with George W. Bush. The Yale brotherhood, take oaths to protect their fellow brothers. Hmm, Makes you think doesn’t it? It wouldn’t make much difference if Kerry would have won anyways. They are both the same, they are both for the same things. It’s just two different puppets held up by the same guy. The illusion that you have choice. When you’re making your decision based on their options, you still lose and they win.
On Strength
Everyday I see a great majority of people are too concerned with trying to act cool or tough. As if this is what life is all about. This is why they are here. Life is so much deeper than appearance. Its much more than tough gestures and hard words. Acting tough, this is just a bunch of fluff. Real toughness and real strength does not come from appearance. It comes from within. The strongest and most courageous people I’ve ever seen have always played down appearance. Why? Because true strength and courage come from within, and when you really have it, you don’t need to try so hard to show it. Its already there and the people can feel it. Don’t try to be strong. Be strong. Don’t try to be tough, be tough. And when it comes to courage, the true courageous are the first to stand up and the first to sacrifice of themself.
In the words of a great patriot: “In the beginning of a change, the patriot is a brave and scarce man, hated and scorned. When the cause succeeds however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot.” — Mark Twain
Commuting Theatre
Commuting at the same time everyday reminds me of doing theatre. Everyone takes their places, as if rehearsed day after day. We perfect this show.
Fox News Runs With Al Qaeda Wildfires Conspiracy Theory
Fox is at it again. Fearmongering as usual and spewing its lies to make the American public cower in fear to sharp-fanged turban wearing Arabs. With no direct evidence, they claim in a conspiracy theory of their own that Al Quada is responsible for the massive California wildfires. Absolutley riidiculous. If for some reason this Al Quada terrorism was real Fox is only aiding the terrorists by ensuring the public remain shaking in their boots. The correct way to defeat terrorism is to ignore it and play it down. If the so-called terrorism does not give the desired effect of terror then the terrorists lose, it is rendered ineffective. By doing what they are doing they are proving this whole thing is a fraud, a scam. Perhaps this is why some call it Faux News.
Would you like fries with your unemployment check?
When it comes to food we upsize em’ and when it comes to jobs we downsize em’. That’s the American way.
Listen what I say, Hey Hey.
I think sometimes people mistake my kindness as weakness. This is a grave error. I am kind because it will get you farther in life than being a hardass tough guy. Nobody likes those types except the military. There is no weakness here, just a desire to be happy and care about others along the way. This is the good life, the better life.
The Biggest Scam
The law and banking industries are probably the biggest scams in history. They have the most to gain and also the most to lose if the general public ever found out the truth of how they industries truly work.
Deconstructing The Myth Of AIDS
In 1984 we were told that HIV was the cause of AIDS. In his provocative documentary film, “Deconstructing the Myth of AIDS,” Gary Null, Ph.D., challenges virtually every statement ever made by the American medical industrial complex on the virus - including those of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the National Institute for Health (NIH) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). While presenting the findings of Nobel Prize-winning scientists and leading virologists, the film exposes the political maneuvering, conspiracies and cover-ups that have provided obstacles to the study of this human catastrophe from the start.
While presenting the findings of Nobel Prize-winning scientists and leading virologists, the film exposes the political maneuvering, conspiracies and cover-ups that have provided obstacles to the study of this human catastrophe from the start.
For example, there are experts who believe that AIDS is the result of multiple factors, including drug use, stress and nutritional deficiency, but that government agencies made a politically strategic decision to de-emphasize these hypotheses and thus discourage certain researchers and their funding. Meanwhile, AZT, an infamously failed treatment for cancer, and now the primary FDA-approved approach to treating AIDS, is highly toxic and can produce the very symptoms of the illness it is prescribed to treat.
“Deconstructing the Myth of AIDS” goes beyond medicine and science to question the very foundation of our reliance on government bureaucracies where it concerns matters of life and death.
Google Video: Deconstructing The Myth Of AIDS
Are you liable to pay Income Taxes?
Are you liable to pay Income Taxes? Let’s find out by looking at the U.S. Codes and legal definitions of the terms we are presumably under.
“Taxpayer” (in 26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(14))
Taxpayer
The term “taxpayer” means any person subject to any internal revenue tax.
This same definition is repeated in 26 U.S.C. 1313(b):
26 U.S.C. §1313: Definitions
(b) Taxpayer
Notwithstanding section 7701 (a)(14), the term “taxpayer” means any person subject to a tax under the applicable revenue law.
So any person subject to a tax. Let’s find out who is subject to the income tax.
Why does Congress and the IRS want to refer to us as “taxpayers” instead of “Citizens” in the Internal Revenue Code, the Code of Federal Regulations, and the IRS Publications? Because then you as a Citizen would start looking in the index for the U.S. Codes and find out that there are no references to liability for taxes as a Citizen! They would also have to start talking about your constitutional rights as an American, and the fact is that you have no constitutional rights as a U.S. Citizen (see Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 (1901), but you do as a Citizen of the United States of America, or the [u]nited States! The words you use in describing yourself make all the difference in the world! So instead of calling you a Citizen and then having to justify what makes you a taxpayer, they try to fool you by calling everyone taxpayers and then never defining anywhere in the Internal Revenue Code who specifically is and is not personally liable for paying income taxes, and by arrogantly and petulantly refusing to discuss such issues with you when you call the IRS 800 help number so they can claim “plausible deniability” of the fraud that is going on! They leave the risk entirely up to you in deciding if you are a taxpayer and give you no help whatsoever in deciding what to believe.
Most people mistakenly believe all monies they receive are “income”. However, the U.S. Supreme Court has acknowleged that this is simply not the case:
“We must reject in this case, as we have rejected in cases arising under the Corporation Excise Tax Act of 1909 (Doyle, Collector, v. Mitchell Brothers Co., 247 U.S. 179, 38 Sup. Ct. 467, 62 L. Ed. –), the broad contention submitted on behalf of the government that all receipts—everything that comes in-are income within the proper definition of the term “gross income”, and that the entire proceeds of a conversion of capital assets, in whatever form and under whatever circumstances accomplished, should be treated as gross income. Certainly the term “income” has no broader meaning in the 1913 act than in that of 1909 (see Stratton’s Independence v. Howbert, 231 U.S. 399, 416, 417 S., 34 Sup. Ct. 136), and for the present purpose we assume there is not difference in its meaning as used in the two acts.”
[Southern Pacific Co., v. Lowe, 247 U.S. 330, 38 S. Ct. 540 (1918)]
Definition of “Employee” (in 26 U.S.C. §3401(c))
26 U.S.C. §3401
(c) Employee
For purposes of this chapter, the term “employee” includes [is limited to] an officer, employee, or elected official of the United States, a State, or any political subdivision thereof, or the District of Columbia, or any agency or instrumentality of any one or more of the foregoing. The term “employee” also includes an officer of a corporation.
**Notice the term “Employee” in there? How can you define a word with its own word? You see how they put employee in there (it refers to a corporate employee of the federal United States) to make you think it applies to you, a private worker working for a private business. The term “Employee” is different in the law dictionary than what you and I know it as. When the IRS asks you if you are an “Employee” working for an “Employer”, what they are asking you is not what you think they are asking you. What they are asking you is if you are an employee of the United States (corporate entity). When you say yes, you are now admitting you are “within the Federal Zone/jurisdiction of the United States doing business in the District of Columbia as defined in the Constitution as ten square miles of area etc. When you ask the IRS if you are liable to pay Income Tax, they will ask you, “Do you earn Income?” And you will probably say yes, because this is the term we have all grown into, we think of our earnings as income, when in fact it usually is not. “Income” is not technically defined anywhere in the I.R.C. (how odd…). However we can look to Supreme Court rulings from the past to get an idea of what it is, without citing them all, it will take me forever, please look them up yourself. But here is one we can get an idea of what Income means.
Definition of Income, taken from the Supreme Court case of Eisner v. Macomber, 252 U.S. 189 (1920) and the definition found in Bouvier’s Law dictionary;
“Income may be defined as the gain derived from capital, from labor, or from both combined,” provided it be understood to include profit gained through a sale or conversion of capital assets, to which it was applied in the Doyle Case, 247 U.S. 183, 185, 38 S. Sup. Ct. 467, 469 (62 I. Ed. 1054).
So as you see, Income is profit or gain you make from some type of investment or corporate activity. It has nothing to do with the average working guy or gal earning a paycheck from their labor.
Even more interesting is the regulation corresponding to this definition, which states:
26 CFR §31.3401(c) Employee:
“…the term [employee] includes officers and employees, whether elected or appointed, of the United States, a [federal] State, Territory, Puerto Rico or any political subdivision, thereof, or the District of Columbia, or any agency or instrumentality of any one or more of the foregoing. The term “employee” also includes an officer of a corporation.”
Now isn’t that interesting? The I.R.C. says you aren’t considered an employee as far as payroll deductions unless you are an elected or appointed political officer of the United States in direct receipt of government privileges! And yes, the IRS will vociferously deny that the income tax is an excise tax, which is synonymous with “privilege” tax. This section means the U.S. Government has no authority whatsoever to be telling private employers to withhold pay or hold them liable for not withholding! Even more interesting is the definition of “employee” found in 5 U.S.C. §2105:
2105. Employee
(a) For the purpose of this title, “employee”, except as otherwise provided by this section or when specifically modified, means an officer and an individual who is –
(1) appointed in the civil service by one of the following acting in an official capacity –
(A) the President;
(B) a Member or Members of Congress, or the Congress;
(C) a member of a uniformed service;
(D) an individual who is an employee under this section;
(E) the head of a Government controlled corporation; or
(F) an adjutant general designated by the Secretary concerned under section 709(c) of title 32;
(2) engaged in the performance of a Federal function under authority of law or an Executive act; and
(3) subject to the supervision of an individual named by paragraph (1) of this subsection while engaged in the performance of the duties of his position.
[….skipped a few entries since irrelevant…]
(d) A Reserve of the armed forces who is not on active duty or who is on active duty for training is deemed not an employee or an individual holding an office of trust or profit or discharging an official function under or in connection with the United States because of his appointment, oath, or status, or any duties or functions performed or pay or allowances received in that capacity.
Another very interesting insight comes from 26 CFR §31.3401(c)-1, which states:
(b) Generally, physicians, lawyers, dentists, veterinarians, contractors, subcontractors, public stenographers, auctioneers, and others who follow an independent trade, business, or profession, in which they offer their services to the public, are not employees.
The United States is a corporation. Just like corporations have presidents, executives, officials, treasurers and employee’s, so does the United States.
TITLE 28 > PART VI > CHAPTER 176 > SUBCHAPTER A > § 3002
(15) “United States” means—
(A) a Federal corporation;
(B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or
(C) an instrumentality of the United States.
In conclusion of this post, this is a very difficult subject to tackle in one post. Looking up cites and researching and laying it out properly so that someone with no idea what you are talking about can easily understand. This will take multiple posts to try and convey. Lots and LOTS of stuff I haven’t hit on. This is a most amazing subject. As you will find out (and by doing your own research) we are living in a corporate fiction, a D.B.A. (doing business as) a virtual matrix if you will. Once you understand that we are living by completely different rules (terms, words) than the legal realm we exist in, you will begin to understand how we are duped into thinking our world works one way, but in fact is something completely different. Stay tuned.
Inner Dialog
Sometimes I wish could hear people’s inner dialog. But not all the time, I think I would go insane.
